Council Called Out Over Lack of School Streets

Borough only one in inner London not to have a programme

School Streets have been implemented widely elsewhere in London

 

Partnership Aims To Boost Number of EV Charge Points

New H&F Council Cabinet Nominations Announced

H&F Appoints Its Youngest Ever Mayor

Hammersmith Becomes Home for Ukrainian Woman

Big Changes Ahead for Library Services in the Borough

Library of Things To Be Launched in Hammersmith

Hammersmith and Fulham Stands with Ukraine

Hammersmith Hit By Spate of Flytipping

Sign up for email newsletters from FulhamSW6.com, HammersmithToday.co.uk and ShepherdsBushW12.com

A plea is being made to Hammersmith & Fulham (H&F) Council to implement a ‘School Street’ programme to protect local children from poor air quality.

Representatives from a third of all primary schools in the borough have written to council leaders to request the measures which would include timed road closures during drop-off and pickup.

The group says that School Streets have been proven to be effective at reducing air pollution and traffic danger for children, as well as supporting families to walk or cycle the school run.

H&F is the only Inner London borough, and one of only two boroughs across the entire city, to have implemented no School Streets with a trial having been abandoned despite council officers reporting favourably on the outcome. H&F Council was actually one of the first London boroughs to trial a School Street in 2018, but the scheme was removed without warning before the trial period had ended, reportedly following a personal intervention by council leader Stephen Cowan.

A 2021 FOI request revealed that the scheme had been judged a success by officers as it had achieved its objectives, but was still cancelled “due to the council’s policy of fairness to motorists” following complaints from car drivers - who then had their fines for breaching the restrictions refunded. Residents of neighbouring streets had also complained directly to the council leader, who is a local councillor for the ward in which the trial took place, about rat run traffic now passing their homes instead of the primary school gates. The council has confirmed that it has no plans to reintroduce such schemes.

The schemes have also been consistently popular in London where they have been introduced.

Air quality at every single school in Hammersmith and Fulham is in breach of interim World Health Organization guidelines on particulate and nitrogen dioxide pollution according to figures released by the Mayor of London and the request was made on the day of the national Clean Air Day initiative.

The letter, coordinated by newly formed local community action group H&F Clean Air Parents, was also sent to the newly appointed cabinet members for public realm, climate change and children. It explains that figures from the Healthy Streets Scorecard coalition show London now has over 500 School Streets, mostly introduced since April 2020, with neighbouring boroughs like Brent and Hounslow each boasting dozens of schemes. Even Kensington & Chelsea, often seen as London’s most pro-car borough, already has nine School Streets and plans for more.

The only other London borough to have implemented zero School Streets is Bexley, which has the lowest rates of walking and cycling in the capital.

School Streets have been operating at a small scale in the UK since 2017, but rose to prominence during the pandemic, as new funding and statutory guidance from government instructed councils to implement them wherever possible. Support from London Mayor Sadiq Khan has seen millions of pounds allocated to London boroughs to roll out the schemes.

The letter also calls out the council’s own ‘Healthy School Streets’ programme as inadequate and misleading, as the projects it is delivering contain no traffic restrictions, instead being limited to measures like planting new flowerbeds, widening pavements and re-painting 20mph road markings. The group says these measures do not meet the required standards for Streetspace for London schemes and that it is unclear whether TfL are aware that their funding is being used in this way.

Nikita Crocker, H&F Clean Air Parents organiser, said, “We just want children at our schools to benefit from the same protections now enjoyed by pupils at hundreds of schools in other boroughs across the capital. London’s air pollution crisis is especially damaging for children, routinely hospitalising asthma sufferers and stunting the lung development of all children growing up in areas where the air is not safe to breathe. Scientists say this childhood exposure is likely to knock years off their lives, and lead to a range of chronic respiratory and other health problems.

“We need the council to urgently step up and use the powers it has to protect our kids, and so-called ‘Healthy School Streets’ that do nothing to address the core problem of motor traffic at the school gates are simply not good enough.”

A spokesperson for the council cited the South Fulham Traffic, Congestion and Pollution Reduction scheme as the council’s preferred method of improving air quality saying, “We agree with the group – who rightly say the main problem with School Streets is that it creates ‘rat run traffic passing homes instead of the primary school gates’. We can do better than that.

“We’re rolling out our award-winning ‘air cleansing scheme’ that does more and goes further than they do by taking a holistic approach.

“Our pioneering initiative slashes rat-running traffic across whole neighbourhoods and is helping to reduce poisonous NO2 in the air we breathe.”

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.


Jacob Phillips - Local Democracy Reporter

June 17, 2022

Bookmark and Share