Mayor Rejects Call to Pause New Floating Bus Stops

Says collisions are rare and they are not discouraging the elderly and disabled


A bus island on Cycleway 9 in Chiswick

 

Geo-fence Restrictions for e-scooters Reduced

Tackling Fare Dodging on Tubes and Buses Costs £22million

Mayor Says People Who Drive are Not the 'Boogeyman'

Ten New Express Bus Routes Proposed by Mayor

Mayor Backs Heathrow Southern Rail Link

Driverless Tube Trains Ruled Out by TfL Commissioner

Mayor, TfL and Bus Companies Blamed for Driver Fatality Rates

Sign up for email newsletters from ActonW3.com, BrentfordTW8.com, ChiswickW4.com, EalingToday.co.uk, FulhamSW6.com HammersmithToday.co.uk and PutneySW15.com

October 30, 2024

Sadiq Khan has refused to bow to pressure from within his own party to “pause” the roll-out of ‘floating bus stops’, amid concerns over the safety of older and disabled Londoners.

The Mayor was urged last week by a Labour member of the London Assembly to order a halt to the ‘bus stop bypasses’, which are found where a cycle lane cuts a bus stop off from the rest of the pavement.

Mr Khan’s office has responded by saying that “very few collisions” have occurred between cyclists and pedestrians at the stops, but added that City Hall is “actively working with disabled and accessibility groups to look at improvements to the design, as well as the behaviour of road users”.

The floating bus stop design is intended to allow cyclists to keep moving, rather than being caught behind buses or forced to cycle out into busier lanes of traffic. Bus users are expected to cross the cycle lane to reach the pavement, usually via a ‘mini-zebra crossing’.

But the National Federation of the Blind of the UK (NFBUK) has said the bypasses are “chaotic, confusing and dangerous places which are not safe or accessible for blind and visually impaired people to use independently”.

A Transport for London (TfL) safety review, published in June, found that more than a third of the capital’s bus stop bypasses varied “significantly” from its best practice design guidance.

It added however: “The chance of being injured by someone cycling at a bus stop bypass is very low compared to the chance of being injured by a driver on the wider network”.

Despite this assurance, Labour assembly member Elly Baker said in a letter to the Mayor last week that she was “still concerned” that the bypasses were hazardous for some pedestrians.

“The replies I have received have not allayed my concerns,” she wrote, adding: “Our buses remain by far our most accessible form of transport, and we must remain committed to the network both in word and deed and expand, not reduce, access to an affordable, accessible and effective bus network.”

She repeated her request “for a pause of the rollout of any new bus stop bypasses”.

Elly Baker AM
Elly Baker AM. Picture: London Assembly

Approached for comment, a spokeswoman for the Mayor said, “Protected cycle routes, which can feature bus stop bypasses on bus routes, reduce the risk of injury to cyclists by 40-65 per cent and are an important part of London’s Vision Zero goal to eliminate deaths and serious injuries on our roads.

“Bus stop bypasses are in line with government guidance and are a nationally recognised approach to help avoid the dangers of cyclists going around buses into oncoming traffic.

“The Mayor is committed to making London a more inclusive city and supporting more people to walk, cycle and take public transport. That is why he asked TfL to carry out a review into the safety of bus stop bypasses. TfL’s recent report found that very few collisions have occurred at bus stop bypasses and that they have not led to a reduction in bus stop use by older or disabled customers.

“However, we recognise the concerns that some people have, and we are actively working with disabled and accessibility groups to look at improvements to the design as well as the behaviour of road users to ensure bus stop bypasses are as safe as possible for everyone.”

Noah Vickers - Local Democracy Reporter

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.