Mayor Says People Who Drive are Not the 'Boogeyman'
Insists he is not anti-motorist as he rules out further ULEZ changes
Sadiq Khan at the first Mayor's Question Time after his election win
May 24, 2024
Sadiq Khan has insisted he is not “anti-motorist”, as he ruled out making any further changes to the Ultra low emission zone (ULEZ).
In his first Mayor’s Question Time session since winning re-election this month, Mr Khan was challenged on the issue by several London Assembly members.
Alessandro Georgiou, a newly-elected Tory member, said, “There has been a war on the motorist – whether it be by the ULEZ expansion, low traffic neighbourhood or 20mph zones.”
The mayor expanded the ULEZ to cover all of Greater London in August 2023.
Mr Georgiou asked the Labour mayor, “Do you understand that in outer London, we do need our cars for travel?
“The disabled need their cars, parents on the school run need their cars, because not everyone lives within or under a mile to a primary or secondary school. Do you understand that the elderly also need their cars?”
He stressed that the public transport system is much poorer in the suburbs than in the inner city.
Mr Khan said, “I’m well aware that the Conservatives tried to portray me during the [mayoral election] campaign as being anti-motorist – and that was a theory and a thesis rejected by Londoners on May 2.
“I’m not anti-motorist. I am in favour of cars driving where they can at 20mph rather than 30mph. Why? Because you’re five times more likely to kill somebody and cause them serious injury if you’re driving at 30mph rather than 20mph.”
He added that he was also in favour of improving safety for cyclists and in bringing about “clean air”.
“But I also accept that there are parts of London where public transport is less good,” he said.
The mayor pointed to his plans to expand the Superloop network of express bus services as one example of his work to make it easier for people not to travel by car.
Mr Khan admitted however, “Everyone often has a good reason to use their cars. We’ve got to recognise that people are going to carry on using cars, because they’re important. Whether it’s for shopping, whether it’s because you’re older, whether it’s because of childcare issues, or whatever.
“So nobody is saying ‘ban the car, or prohibit the use of the car’. It’s about recognising we’ve got to be encouraging others to use active travel, to walk and cycle as well, and to give people alternatives.”
He said that when the Tories accuse him of being anti-motorist, “the results are, Londoners reject that, and vote for me in record numbers”.
He later added: “I drive. The idea that people who drive are the boogeyman, is not coming from me.”
The mayor committed in his re-election manifesto “to keeping the London-wide ULEZ standards the same over the next four years,” adding that he also rules out “a move to any form of pay-per-mile smart road user charging system”.
This means that Mr Khan has effectively pledged not to change the definition of a ‘ULEZ-compliant’ vehicle.
Alex Wilson, recently elected as Reform UK’s first ever assembly member, pressed Mr Khan on whether he can be trusted on those promises.
He pointed out that the mayor had previously said in July 2021 he had “no plans” to expand the ULEZ across Greater London, before announcing the expansion just eight months later.
The mayor reiterated that no changes would be made on either ULEZ or the introduction of a pay-per-mile system.
He added, “It’s important you asked me that question, because people understandably were nervous, because they received leaflets that were blatant lies, and Londoners rejected that deceit from the Conservatives.”
Mr Khan was also challenged by his Tory mayoral opponent, Susan Hall – newly re-elected as an assembly member – on whether he would be amending his official transport strategy to enshrine his promise not to bring in pay-per-mile.
The mayor said this would be “a pointless distraction”, because he had already been explicit in his manifesto about his intentions.
Noah Vickers - Local Democracy Reporter
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |