Opposition Call for Clarity After Streetspace Legal Ruling |
|
High Court judgement may have implications for borough transport schemes The Conservative opposition on Hounslow Council are calling for a statement to be issued immediately on the implications of a recent High Court judgement for local Streetspace measures. This Wednesday (20 January) Justice Lang ordered that TfL’s Streetspace Plan and the associated Guidance be quashed after a case was presented to the High Court by the Licensed Taxi Drivers’ Association (LTDA). She concluded that that the justification for the measures imposed was "not evidence based" and was "mere conjecture, which was not a rational basis upon which to transform London's roads". As well as quashing the restriction on black cabs accessing certain road in the City of London the judge ruled that TfL’s “Interim Guidance to Boroughs” on which many local Streetspace policies are based is illegal. The measures proposed and implemented "far exceeded what was reasonably required to meet any temporary challenges created by the pandemic" such that "the decision-making processes …. were seriously flawed, and the decisions were not a rational response to the issues which arose as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic". The judge ruled that no attempt to account for the distinct status of taxis as a form of public transport particularly with regard to their use by people with mobility issues. She stated that TfL’s Order, “falls to be judged in the context of the extent to which it impacts adversely on disabled and elderly people.” Darren Rogers of Chiltern Law, who acted on behalf of the LTDA said, “This was a hard fought and complicated Judicial Review where the regulated took on the regulator and sets a precedent when authorities close roads without proper analysis and care. Untramelled discretion must be scrutinised and reviewed. Mrs Justice Lang’s judgement lays bare the unlawfulness of Streetspace as a plan and in practice.” It is not clear how this ruling will impact the transport measures taken since the beginning of the pandemic by Hounslow Council which had a similar rationale to the City of London scheme. The Chief Executive of the borough has told opposition councillors that the judgement is being urgently reviewed. Opponents of the temporary scheme for Cycleway 9 claim the same arguments could be used against it because of the removal of bus lanes and the difficulty of accessing bus stop islands for the disabled. Cllr Sam Hearn, Chair of the Traffic and Transport Committee of the Conservative Group said, “It is truly shocking that so much public funding and residents’ goodwill have been squandered by the heavy-handed and dictatorial approach adopted by the Council. Most residents are happy to support “Many other London boroughs have at least reversed the most unfair and irrational TfL funded schemes. But not Hounslow. They refuse to listen. They have continued to justify their actions based on flimsy assumptions that lack any credible supporting evidence.” We have asked Hounslow Council for comment but are yet to receive a response.
January 23, 2021
|