Mayor Dismisses Watchdog Criticism of ULEZ Ads

Says science used to justify expansion remains sound

Expanded scheme will be operational within 10 months
ULEZ was extended across London at the end of August

 

Sky News Reports of ULEZ Fraud Dismissed by TfL

Over 500 ULEZ Camera Crimes Being Investigated

ULEZ Scrappage Scheme Extended to All Londoners

ULEZ Generates £220 Million of Revenue in a Year

Local Councils Welcome ULEZ Scrappage Scheme Expansion

Mayor Claims Silent Majority Back the ULEZ

Anger Over Mayor’s ULEZ Protest 'Far Right' Comments

No Plan B if ULEZ Expansion Blocked in Courts

Angry Scenes over ULEZ at City Hall Event

Elderly Residents 'Missing Funerals Due to ULEZ'

Union Warns Airport Staff Set to Quit if ULEZ Extended

Mayor Says ULEZ Consultation 'Not a Referendum'

Assembly Member's Second Hand Car Advice Unwelcome

ULEZ Equipment Costs To Top £100 million

Sign up for email newsletters from ActonW3.com, BrentfordTW8.com, ChiswickW4.com, EalingToday.co.uk, FulhamSW6.com HammersmithToday.co.uk, PutneySW15.com, ShepherdsBushW12.com, WandsworthSW18.com and WimbledonSW19.com

November 22, 2023

Sadiq Khan has said he is unworried by reports that Transport for London (TfL) misled the public in adverts about the benefits of the Ultra low emission zone (Ulez).

According to the Sunday Telegraph, a draft report by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has found that TfL – which is chaired by Mr Khan – produced ads which “were likely to mislead” viewers.

This is because they “did not clarify” that claims about air pollution levels were based on estimates, rather than actual figures.

Asked about the matter by the Local Democracy Reporting Service this week, the mayor said: “I don’t know a lot about it.”

“What I do know is there’s a disagreement about wording, to do with an advert that’s I think almost a year old.

“I think TfL are speaking to the ASA. I think it’s a draft report, from what I’ve seen in the media, and hopefully TfL and the ASA will resolve it.”

Pressed on whether it was an issue that concerned him, Mr Khan said, “No, the science is sound. It’s just a question of a disagreement about wording.”

The adverts, which were broadcast and published between January and June, claimed that the existing ULEZ in central London had “almost halved levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2)” and that “most air pollution related deaths actually occur in outer London”.

The draft of the watchdog’s conclusions found that the adverts were misleading because they “did not clarify” that claims about NO2 levels were based on estimates or modelled scenarios and not actual figures.

A TfL spokesman told the Sunday Telegraph it was “strongly challenging” the draft recommendations.

“The ASA is not challenging the science… the science is absolutely clear about the significant harm of air pollution on people’s health and that estimated premature deaths from air pollution are higher in outer London than in inner London. We are confident that the advertisement is accurate,” he said.

“Scientific analysis based on modelled scenarios and estimates is standard practice in the scientific community. We are meeting with the ASA to take them through the data and explain in detail how it is used.

“It remains the case that the expansion of the ultra low emission zone is playing a crucial role in the reduction of air pollution – improving air quality for everyone in London and reducing the harms to health associated with vehicle emissions.”

The ASA refused to comment to the Sunday Telegraph on the leaked document but a source told the newspaper that the final ruling had not been issued and so the findings could change. The final ruling is set to be officially released in the next few weeks.

A total of 578 people were said to have contacted the ASA to “challenge” TfL to prove its adverts’ claims.

Noah Vickers - Local Democracy Reporter

 

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the ch November 22, 2023 . For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.