GLA Conservatives Question Value of ULEZ Expansion

Claim actual impact of scheme on pollution levels will be negligible


Consultation on scheme expansion ends shortly

 

Assembly Member's Second Hand Car Advice Unwelcome

ULEZ To Be Extended Across Whole of London

Calls Made for ULEZ To Be Extended To Improve Air Quality

ULEZ Equipment Costs To Top £100 million

11,000 Fewer Vehicles a Day in London Since ULEZ Start

Anger as Trips To The Tip Cost More Due To ULEZ

ULEZ Causing Problems for Mortlake Crematorium

Call for ULEZ Exemption for the Disabled

Electric Car Shortage Ahead of ULEZ Deadline

Mayor Criticised For Suggesting People Buy Second Hand Cars

Sign up for email newsletters from ActonW3.com, BrentfordTW8.com, ChiswickW4.com, EalingToday.co.uk, FulhamSW6.com HammersmithToday.co.uk, PutneySW15.com, ShepherdsBushW12.com, WandsworthSW18.com and WimbledonSW19.com

Sadiq Khan is facing growing backlash over plans to expand the Ultra-Low Emission Zone to cover the whole of Greater London, with the City Hall Conservatives describing the potential impact as “negligible”.

As the public consultation over the plans comes to an end on Friday, City Hall has released new figures that claim to show five million people in outer London would breathe cleaner air as a result of expanding the ULEZ to cover the whole of Greater London.

Of these, 340,000 Londoners would, for the first time, live in areas that meet World Health Organisation targets for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels.

But a TfL document published earlier this month found that the initial expansion of the zone to the north and south circular roads last October had had a “limited” impact on pollution levels, calling into question the potential impact of further expansion.

The measure has already been criticised for disproportionately impacting low to middle income workers who tend to have older cars which are more likely to be non-compliant. Many people are saying that the need to purchase a new car will compound their already difficult financial situation.

Conservative Assembly Member Shaun Bailey, who clashed with Sadiq Khan on several occasions during the 2021 mayoral election, said the ULEZ is “a story of a mayor seeking a legacy” and called into question the estimated £200 million cost of expanding the zone further.

Mr Bailey said, “Considering any positive environmental impact will be negligible at best, the eye-watering price tag of £200m could be far better spent on schemes that will actually improve London’s air.

“It’s imperative that any road charging work is done in conjunction with the Government, to ensure that London forms part of a national scheme that is revenue neutral. Londoners cannot be expected to bear the financial burden of Khan’s legacy and pay twice to implement a scheme that hasn’t been properly considered.”

The Mayor of London has said it is “unarguable” that the initial expansion of the ULEZ last year has been a success, with 67,000 fewer non-compliant vehicles on the roads and 21,000 fewer vehicles overall.

Mr Khan said it is important to take “bold action” to improve air quality for everyone, not just those living in inner London.

He added, “Deadly air pollution contributes to children developing stunted lungs, asthma and a whole host of other health issues and new research has shown that it also puts people at increased risk of developing dementia. We need to act now to protect the most vulnerable from the worst consequences of toxic air and build a safer, fairer, greener and more prosperous city for everyone.”

Joe Talora - Local Democracy Reporter

 

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the ch July 29, 2022 . For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.


July 29, 2022