Local Government Ombudsman Admonishes Ealing Council

Says it is 'disappointing' suggested remedies are not being implemented


There were 23 rulings against Ealing Council last year

Related articles

Air Quality Monitoring Devices To Be Installed Near Local Schools

Ealing Council Plans Cultural Manifesto

Large Increases in Allowances Proposed for Ealing Councillors

'Shocking' Safety Flaws in Ealing's Housing Provision

Ealing Council Plans £23 Million Spending Programme

Ealing Council Appoints New Chief Executive

Concerns Raised About EV Charging Point Shortage in Ealing

Ealing Council Takes Six Years To Deal With Leaking Roof

Ealing Council Set To Appoint Interim Chief Executive

Ealing Council Chief Executive Stepping Down

Ealing Councillor Apologises for Accepting Cannes Hospitality

Concerns Raised That £30 Million Lent By Ealing Council at Risk

Residents Groups Unconvinced By Ealing's New Planning Policy

Participate

Sign up for a newsletter from ActonW3.com, ChiswickW4.com and EalingToday.co.uk

Michael King, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, has written to Tony Clements, the chief executive of Ealing Council, expressing disappointment in the borough’s handling of complaints. He says that the council has been slow to implement remedies within agreed timescales despite the issue being raised for three consecutive years.

The letter is part of an annual review of the performance of all local authorities across the country.

In the year to March 2022, there were 23 rulings against Ealing Council by the Ombudsman, which oversees complaints by residents about council services. There were 38 complaints made in total during the year with 61% of these being upheld compared to an average of 71% in similar authorities.

The previous year the Ombudsman had issued a report about Ealing Council after a care provider, contracted to the council, had falsified records when copies were requested.

In addition, the Ombudsman says that the council failed to act when a safeguarding alert was raised, until a complaint was made and that it then carried out a flawed investigation.

Mr King acknowledges that Ealing Council accepted the findings of these reports and agreed to follow recommendations about service improvements.

However, he goes on to say in the letter to Mr Clements, “We recorded our satisfaction with your Council’s compliance in 25 cases where we recommended a remedy. However, it is disappointing that in six of these cases, remedies were not completed
within the agreed timescales. In one case it took over two years to carry out a policy review.

“This is the third consecutive year where I have raised concerns about delays in the remedy process, so it is disappointing to see the issue persists. I once again invite the Council to consider how it might make improvements to act on our recommendations within the agreed timescales.”

Liberal Democrat, Cllr Gary Malcolm, Leader of the Opposition, said, “Liberal Democrats have said for many years that too many people have trouble getting their problems fixed and the 150 formal complaints about Labour-run Ealing Council made to the Ombudsman in the last year is shocking. For the Council to have allowed records to be falsified is a scandal. Residents feel the Council is not listening to them. Each complaint shows something has gone wrong. Labour-run Ealing Council needs to admit they are failing in this area. They need to make changes to ensure that residents’ complaints are dealt with quickly and actions put in place to stop them happening again.”


A council spokesperson said, "The council is committed to dealing with all complaints in a fair, comprehensive, and timely way but in a small number of cases, often where the complaint is multi-layered or involves more than one service across the council, they require more input and process. We are considering the Ombudsman’s letter and the actions to take to improve our response times.”

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.

 

July 28, 2022

Bookmark and Share